Opinion: Super-Human Identity Management for AI Agents

Introduction

AI agents aren’t your typical service accounts. They don’t just follow scripts—they think, plan, and act across systems. With a single prompt, they can trigger actions that span calendars, expense tools, and internal approval chains. But today’s identity frameworks—built for humans and static bots—weren’t designed for this level of autonomy. As agent adoption accelerates, security models must evolve just as fast.

Treating AI agents as ordinary “non‑human identities” is risky.

We need Super‑Human Identity Management instead. Agents are not lifeless accounts that sit behind an API key or a simple OAuth flow. They reason, re‑plan, pivot across systems, and ask for new privileges multiple times within the same workflow. Forcing them into a security model built for static scripts and headless APIs is dangerous.

OAuth and API keys are not enough.

A microservice with a fixed function can live within a static scope. An agent can:

• Scan a calendar
• Book a lower-cost flight
• File a reimbursement
• Notify a manager—all in one reasoning loop.
  
  

No single pre-scoped token can—or should—safely cover that entire chain of agent actions.

Why do we need a super‑human identity model?

‍

1. Autonomy – Agents set their own sub‑goals; static roles can’t predict the next hop.
2. Velocity – Decisions happen in milliseconds; quarterly reviews are too late.
3. Scale – One prompt can trigger hundreds of downstream calls, each with new privilege needs.
4. Opacity – Without purpose‑built logging, the reasoning path disappears the moment it runs.
   
   

When capability increases by orders of magnitude, control frameworks must evolve by orders of magnitude too.

Why is this urgent?

1. Agents are already live through the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
2. Google’s new Agent‑to‑Agent (A2A) specification will accelerate adoption. These specs open the door for agents to make real-time decisions across apps with minimal human intervention.
3. Identity defenses are fragile: Gartner links over 75 % of cloud‑security failures to identity mismanagement—before autonomous agents even enter production.
   
   

The identity tools we use for humans and NHIs are necessary—but not sufficient—for autonomous agents. We need a super‑human identity management paradigm that matches their speed, intent, and scale.

‍

‍

Conclusion

Autonomous agents are no longer hypothetical—they’re already shaping workflows inside the enterprise. But the velocity and intelligence they bring also demand a complete rethink of how we define, scope, and supervise identity. If we want to unlock their full potential safely, we can’t rely on IAM playbooks written for humans or headless bots.

It’s time to build for the next frontier: Super-Human Identity Management—designed for agents that think, act, and adapt in real time.

‍